Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Remington 1100 TAC4 Mini-Report





Well, now that I've settled in here a bit, I took a day off to do some gunnie stuff. I was curious to see how my new Remington 1100 TAC4 would pattern with the ammo I commonly keep on-hand. I've always admired the 1100, and I finally bought one. The fit and finish are nice, but it's a bit different to load than my 870, requiring you to push in on the carrier release before the carrier itself will swing up, and allow you to push the shells into the magazine. I'm sure I'll get used to it, but for the first time out with it, I was pretty fumbled fingered. This particular gun came with a Hi-Viz front sight, which snaps on just aft of the front bead sight, and has a colored transparent rod in it to give you a "Fiber Optic" effect. It comes with a bunch of different colored rods to suit your mood, I guess. It caught enough of the light in the dimly lit range to be more visible than the bead sight, but out in the shop area, under the store lights, it *really* lit up. It's 100% plastic, so I have my doubts about its durability, but it was a nice touch that Remington included it.
As far as the ammo I used goes, I have some Remington "Green and Yellow Box" ammo part #"12B00", some Federal "Power-Shok" part # "F12700", some Wolf "Power Buckshot" no part # on box, and some Winchester Supreme "High Velocity" part # "SB1200". I also tried some of the "Estate" brand birdshot that we train with at the range, as I'd heard it wouldn't cycle the gun properly. Out of the five Estate shells I fired, two of them stove-piped, and the other three cycled and ejected properly. Except for the birdshot, all ammo was off-the-shelf "00 Buck" loads purchased from Midway or Sportsman's Guide. Nothing special, just plain old "Double Aught Buck". The only surprise was the Winchester High Velocity loads. Man, did they ever KICK! Huge roar, big spout of flame out of the barrel, and the one other guy on the range came down and asked me what in the H3LL I was shooting. The first round of it really caught me off guard, and the barrel wound up at about a 45* angle!
Potent stuff, to say the least.
All targets were placed about "Halfway Down" the range, which is about 25 feet. Probably a bit far for a Home Defense distance, but I wanted them to spread a bit. Since the 1100 TAC4 has changeable choke tubes, I went with what the guys at the range recommended, which is the "Improved Cylinder" tube. I tried to keep my aimpoint at the center of the orange area, and I think I was pretty consistent. The tightest pattern (for THIS gun, on THIS day, with THIS lot number ammo!) was the Federal, which also gave the tightest pattern in my 870 Express. Not sure if that surprises me or not, as if I go back tomorrow, I might get different results. Whatever the case, I feel safe in saying that all the rounds I fired would be acceptable for home defense *as far as accuracy and spread goes*! I don't have a Box 'O Truth to test penetration with, but I *do* agree with him that's it's fun to shoot stuff.
As far as the new target hangers that my friend the Wandering Minstrel has commented about, I didn't have any problem with them. I duct-taped the top edge of the target to some cardboard, and put some duct-tape on the little binder clips (The Original "Bachelor's Chip Clip"!) that grab the target. I think the extra thickness of the cardboard allowed the clip to grab a little more securely, and I'm sure the duct-tape didn't hurt either. I understand why they changed the target hangers, as replacing one used to cost about $50, and now it costs one coat hanger and two small binder clips, but I agree with Minstrel, it just looks El Cheapo, and doesn't anchor the target very well without some kind of backing.

8 comments:

  1. I actually suggested to the Better Half on Sunday that we should bring duct-tape to secure the clips. Glad to see your report on this.

    In aviation circles, we called duct-tape "100 mile-an-hour" tape since it was commonly used to patch up fabric-covered planes.

    ReplyDelete
  2. And back when I was doing my SCCA thing, we called it "200 MPH Tape".
    Actually I think the NASCAR guys gave it that name, but we 'borrowed' it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jim, pattern a couple of different loads at 15 feet- Then get rid of everything else... an idea pattern is 5 inches or less at 15 feet

    And yes, it does differ from gun to gun- I have a Mossy 590A1 which likes Estate 00 Buck, a friend has a 590, and it likes Federal tactical...

    ReplyDelete
  4. OK....I'll try the same loads again at 15 feet. Should be interesting to see how much difference there is. They've got some Remington 'reduced recoil' at the range, so I'll grab a box of that for grins.

    ReplyDelete
  5. WHY are there no pictures of this fine gun?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Uhhhhhhh....I figured everybody already knew how it *looked*, and would be more interested in how it *worked*!
    Per a request from my buddy Old_NFO, I'll be re-doing the test from 15', so I'll post some pix of the gun after the next trip to the range.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Should be later this week. I just have to pull myself away from getting my HF station back on-the-air.

    ReplyDelete

Keep it civil, please....